kev/null design/book/comics/games/photos/presentations

The World’s Election

During election year, many people say things like, “if you’re not going to vote, you have no right to complain.” That’s a sentiment I agree with but what if you have no ability to vote on something that impacts you directly?

I am, of course, talking about the US elections. I’ve rarely been interested in politics but living in Austin during the first two years of Bush’s term almost forced me to pay attention to how bad things were getting. Now it’s looking like a repeat of 2000 and as I’m seriously considering returning to the States I’m more worried still.

So what’s a Canadian in London, UK to do? Well on my way back from Boston, I saw in The Guardian a piece about how people abroad could help. It listed organizations you could donate to which were technically non-partisan but clearly had a leaning (blacks, Christians, etc.); it talked about a contest that would actually let you go there and physically campaign; and it talked about setting up the ability for you to send a letter to one Clark County, OH undecided voter.

They were clear on several things. First, that the recpient was an undecided voter. Second, they gave clear guidelines to not simply espouse values or lecture. Third, that each person would only receive letters from one individual (i.e., one to one matching).

The neglected to mention that the residents weren’t really expecting these letters so now there is a backlash.

What CNN neglected to mention was that the Guardian never pushed to anti-Bush sentiments. In the original article, which I hold in my hand, it’s clear even on the cover that, despite being a fairly left paper, they were encouraging speaking up – for either side. Personally, I loved the “GB heart GB” button they had.

My feelings are that I feel helpless and I want to be able to do something. I’d like to understand what a person in Clark County or anywhere else for that matter feels and what they’re thinking about and then, maybe, share some of my views.

The American media, on the other hand, have blown this so out of proportion that it’s impossible to act now without severe backlash and probably more harm than good.

So here I am again, hands tied.


4 Comments

There was a huge backlash in Canada during the Canadian elections, when Michael Moore came up to Canada and spoke his opinion on who he believed should be elected. it’s actually against the law in Canada for a non-resident/non-citizen to induce electors to vote or refrain from voting for a particular candidate.

I don’t know what the law is in the US, but I can see why there is a backlash. It’s a shame not to be able to influence the election, given that something like 70% of the world population is against Bush, it sucks to see how close the election actually is in the US.

Posted by whatacritic on 22 October 2004 @ 6am

If Soros can donate $5M to MoveOn, I’m fairly certain you can find a way to do whatever you want with your money.

I also know that the statement “70% of the world population is against Bush” can be said with approximately 0% certainty. Then again being the leader of the most powerful country in the world isn’t exactly supposed to be

Posted by Audiophile on 28 October 2004 @ 4am

It’s a shame not to influence sham legislation. I personally would love to vote to FORCE Britain to give its citizens BACK their right to keep and bear arms. Sure, there is no “Second Amendment” in Great Britain, but it IS a natural/god-given right, and even our poor, socialist-inclined brothers across the pond should have the benefit of the wisdom of our founders. And, of course, it’s only because it might directly affect us (US). And, we would like to put in OUR votes as to whether BG accepts or rejects the Kyoto Convention, wage supports, local beef supplies, etc. After all, don’t they ALL affect the US? While we’re at it, we can vote that BG drop its immigration restrictions, legalize prostitution and pr0nografi (at grade-school level) and pay a bigger share of the UN maintenance. WE (in the US) should be able to directly vote that not only is “gay marriage” legal in GB, but everyone who is already married must have their marriage annulled and be forced to take gay lovers. Oh, the power to boss other people’s politics around. Certainly, we (Americans) could straighten out every single wrong thing in GB if we could only vote in y’alls elections. I’m sure you would want the same for us.

Note: The preceding is ironical sarchasm. I do not support or condone fudging others’ politics just for my own personal convenience. I would likewise fight against the same interference from external (or even non-local) sources. If you all want to vote yourselfs to a tofu only diet, that’s fine. If you even SUGGEST that WE are somehow obligated to take on such idiotic dietary limits becuase YOU think we should, it would be grounds for wholesale nuclear bombardment. ;-)

Posted by Mighty Me on 11 November 2004 @ 4pm

First, if you actually read, I am Canadian. I happen to be in the UK but really, I care so much not because of the overarching influences (which exist) but because I was and likely will be a resident of USA.

Also note that I don’t support the idea of my having a vote in the US elections. I said I’d like to talk to somebody and understand why they’d support the current administration. If open discourse and debate is “influencing the election” well I’m sorry to say, but the internet pretty much made it impossible to stop such a thing.

By the by, do unto others as you would to them. You don’t care if someone leglislates tofu diets but hey, bombing countries because they’re “evil” in your book – that’s A-OK.

Posted by Kevin Cheng on 11 November 2004 @ 5pm