<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twinkle Hijacks Twitter Usernames</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: kevnull</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/comment-page-1#comment-225848</link>
		<dc:creator>kevnull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/?p=554#comment-225848</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going to use a channel, you should respect that namespace, yes. While @ is a standard, if I say @joshuakaufman here on my blog, it&#039;s fine but it shouldn&#039;t post to Twitter. Twitter wasn&#039;t &quot;first&quot; in using @&#039;s either. The problem isn&#039;t using @ in general, it&#039;s using @ on Twitter specifically.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frankly, it&#039;s not about whether Twitter should have an API. It doesn&#039;t even benefit Twinkle or anyone else to have an overlapping namespace on the same channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#39;re going to use a channel, you should respect that namespace, yes. While @ is a standard, if I say @joshuakaufman here on my blog, it&#39;s fine but it shouldn&#39;t post to Twitter. Twitter wasn&#39;t &#8220;first&#8221; in using @&#39;s either. The problem isn&#39;t using @ in general, it&#39;s using @ on Twitter specifically.</p>
<p>Frankly, it&#39;s not about whether Twitter should have an API. It doesn&#39;t even benefit Twinkle or anyone else to have an overlapping namespace on the same channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuakaufman</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/comment-page-1#comment-225825</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuakaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/?p=554#comment-225825</guid>
		<description>So what you&#039;re saying, in short, is that if any other service allows @username to reply/demark/notify users on that service, they shouldn&#039;t be publishing those updates to Twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like Twitter, but to play the devil&#039;s advocate for a moment: you&#039;re barking up the wrong tree.  Just because Twitter was first and currently has the largest number of users, does that mean that everyone else who came after them is doing it wrong? @username syntax is quickly becoming a standard for notifying/demarking users on a service.  Publishing to Twitter is quickly becoming a standard for communicating social services activity. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, Twinkle hijacks Twitter usernames. But yes, it could happen on any other social network, and not just a social network like Twinkle that mimics Twitter.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If there&#039;s one thing that&#039;s definitely broken here, it&#039;s the design of Twitter @username replies.  If they didn&#039;t want usernames to be hijacked, they shouldn&#039;t have allowed publishing to Twitter via their API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#39;re saying, in short, is that if any other service allows @username to reply/demark/notify users on that service, they shouldn&#39;t be publishing those updates to Twitter.</p>
<p>I like Twitter, but to play the devil&#39;s advocate for a moment: you&#39;re barking up the wrong tree.  Just because Twitter was first and currently has the largest number of users, does that mean that everyone else who came after them is doing it wrong? @username syntax is quickly becoming a standard for notifying/demarking users on a service.  Publishing to Twitter is quickly becoming a standard for communicating social services activity. </p>
<p>Yes, Twinkle hijacks Twitter usernames. But yes, it could happen on any other social network, and not just a social network like Twinkle that mimics Twitter.  </p>
<p>If there&#39;s one thing that&#39;s definitely broken here, it&#39;s the design of Twitter @username replies.  If they didn&#39;t want usernames to be hijacked, they shouldn&#39;t have allowed publishing to Twitter via their API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantek</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/comment-page-1#comment-225812</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/?p=554#comment-225812</guid>
		<description>This explains a lot, fellow one letter Twitter user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This explains a lot, fellow one letter Twitter user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Els</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/comment-page-1#comment-225463</link>
		<dc:creator>Els</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/?p=554#comment-225463</guid>
		<description>@ Arshad - that was my idea too, but since I don&#039;t have an iPhone, it seems I can&#039;t even do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Arshad &#8211; that was my idea too, but since I don&#39;t have an iPhone, it seems I can&#39;t even do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arshad</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/comment-page-1#comment-225462</link>
		<dc:creator>Arshad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/?p=554#comment-225462</guid>
		<description>So glad there&#039;s no @snmyname on twinkle.  Maybe I better reserve it before I start getting twinkle spam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad there&#39;s no @snmyname on twinkle.  Maybe I better reserve it before I start getting twinkle spam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/comment-page-1#comment-225459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/?p=554#comment-225459</guid>
		<description>Jeez.  To think I got fed up with Twinkle when they decided rotating my phone was a good reason to show the world map of tweets.  That was bad, but this is worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez.  To think I got fed up with Twinkle when they decided rotating my phone was a good reason to show the world map of tweets.  That was bad, but this is worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesse</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2009/01/twinkle-hijacks-twitter-usernames.html/comment-page-1#comment-225458</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/?p=554#comment-225458</guid>
		<description>@kev, there is nothing stopping them. It&#039;s the wild west with no mountain ranges to pass over to kill off the weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kev, there is nothing stopping them. It&#39;s the wild west with no mountain ranges to pass over to kill off the weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

