<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kev/null &#187; social networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevnull.com/tag/social-networks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevnull.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linked Into LinkedIn</title>
		<link>http://kevnull.com/2006/05/linked-into-linkedin.html</link>
		<comments>http://kevnull.com/2006/05/linked-into-linkedin.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Cheng</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevnull.com/2006/05/linked-into-linkedin.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people have been rediscovering LinkedIn lately. Whenever someone talks about this site, the same kind of things come up. For example, Jared [talked about how it was like collecting baseball cards][1], which seems logical given that most social networking sites have the _pokemon_ effect (&#8220;gotta catch &#8216;em all&#8221;) but that&#8217;s the problem. If you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people have been rediscovering <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" title="LinkedIn">LinkedIn</a> lately. Whenever someone talks about this site, the same kind of things come up. For example, Jared [talked about how it was like collecting baseball cards][1], which seems logical given that most social networking sites have the _pokemon_ effect (&#8220;gotta catch &#8216;em all&#8221;) but that&#8217;s the problem. If you approached LinkedIn like you did MySpace, the value of the site is zero.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I see LinkedIn: I know a fair number of people, especially in the tech and design industry and they span quite a few companies. If a friend wants to apply somewhere, and I know someone at that place, I would love to be able to say, &#8220;hey you should talk to my friend so-and-so at that same company.&#8221; Problem is, I don&#8217;t always know when someone is looking and further, they don&#8217;t usually realize I know someone.</p>
<p>&#8220;What? You applied there? You should have told me. I&#8217;d have hooked you up,&#8221; is what I usually say. If it can benefit my friends and acquaintances, I&#8217;ll gladly share but it&#8217;s really hard to know if one of your friends is connected to a company you&#8217;re interested in without something like LinkedIn.</p>
<p>That value goes way down when you start adding _everyone_, even those you&#8217;ve never met or interacted with, to the network. Which is why I find the ex-colleague feature both a blessing and a curse. Especially in a company the size of Yahoo!, I get requests to link with people I&#8217;ve never even heard of. What&#8217;s the point? My litmus test for accepting invitations is, &#8220;I don&#8217;t have to feel like i know this person so well I can give a reference but I should feel comfortable enough with them that I can introduce them to others on my network without worry.&#8221; That means I just need to know one or two things about who they are and what they do with some level of meaningful interaction (even a 10 minute conversation at a conference, so long as I remember the person).</p>
<p>Others are worried about offending people by not accepting all the invitations that come in. LinkedIn is one place I actually feel perfectly comfortable not accepting invites because I really want to retain the value of the network. It&#8217;s easier to not accept an invite than it is to reject a request for an introduction because you actually don&#8217;t know the person.</p>
<p>Oh and one more thing that bugs me. People who don&#8217;t share who their network members are with people linked to them. Again, what&#8217;s the point? If nobody shared that information (and it&#8217;s only sharing with people you approve anyways), then the whole tool is meaningless.</p>
<p>Anyways, if you&#8217;re not already on, feel free to [look me up][2]. Just don&#8217;t be offended if I don&#8217;t accept.</p>
<p>[1]:http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/09/07/experimenting-with-linkedin/<br />
[2]:https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&#038;key=141230</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevnull.com/2006/05/linked-into-linkedin.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
